<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Projections&#8211;Goldilocks Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bizclarity.com/2009/08/20/financial-projections1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bizclarity.com/2009/08/20/financial-projections1/</link>
	<description>Help for venture-ready companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:17:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://bizclarity.com/2009/08/20/financial-projections1/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizclarity.com/?p=456#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Jameson, Yes you should be modeling all kinds of scenarios in your spreadsheets.  But I hope I didn&#039;t give the impression that you should show all three in your presentation or summary materials (the executive summary).  In a first meeting you only show the middle one, the Goldilocks numbers.  Or, as I tried to show in the example, a high middle, the highest you can go with the projections and still be grounded in defensible reality based on your research and understanding of your customers and market.

I just made a small edit to the post to avoid any further confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jameson, Yes you should be modeling all kinds of scenarios in your spreadsheets.  But I hope I didn&#8217;t give the impression that you should show all three in your presentation or summary materials (the executive summary).  In a first meeting you only show the middle one, the Goldilocks numbers.  Or, as I tried to show in the example, a high middle, the highest you can go with the projections and still be grounded in defensible reality based on your research and understanding of your customers and market.</p>
<p>I just made a small edit to the post to avoid any further confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jameson Detweiler</title>
		<link>http://bizclarity.com/2009/08/20/financial-projections1/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Jameson Detweiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizclarity.com/?p=456#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Steve, this is great. I never even thought of having three models. I&#039;m adding it to our slide deck ASAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, this is great. I never even thought of having three models. I&#8217;m adding it to our slide deck ASAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

